Richard Long's highly anticipated (by me) review of the 3rd instalment in the [REC] series lands today and Richard found it a little bit disappointing, that's not to say it's a bad, just not in keeping with the mythology put forward by the first two film. Anyways check out Richard's review after the jump...
Written by Richard Alan Long
I’ll
start by saying that I don’t mind ‘found footage’ movies. I
enjoyed Paranormal Activity, The Last Broadcast and Last Exorcism. I
liked Cloverfield even if the monster ended up looking like the one
from old Chewits adverts. Then there was the Blair Witch, it started
the trend and became a cinema phenomena but, sadly, aged so badly it
looks like an extended version of ‘You’ve been Framed’.
When
doing a found footage sequel you are going to have problems, which
was where Paranormal Activity suffered. With Rec it worked because
in the first movie a TV crew was shooting a documentary and they
witnessed a horrific incident by chance and then Rec 2, set moments
after the first worked because the swat team had head cams to keep in
contact and make a record of what was happening. It was believable
and thus when a third film was announced I wondered how they could
continue the hand held camera approach without making it a bit silly.
Rec
3, is set within a wedding, where video cameras are ripe. However,
Rec decides it wants to change its winning formula from handheld to
being a cinematic movie; this is both brave and risky.
The
Rec movies revolve around a quarantined building in which a possessed
girl has attacked others and is spreading a virus. More Demons than
The Exorcist, the two movies both took their subject matter deadly
serious and to extremes.
Rec
3 starts for the first 20mins with the video camera’s POV of Clara
and Koldo’s wedding day. During this time we see guests and if
you’ve seen the first movies you’ll see where things are going
with the uncle whom mentions a dog bit him.
So
after the first twenty minutes which ends in the first attack by a
possessed uncle the overdue credit sequence begins and that’s when
the film abandons the found footage formula. I like that the
filmmakers paid homage to what had gone before. It was nice and fit
in great with the wedding theme. The change in film style works well
but it’s not the change in film format that harms this franchise,
it’s the change in content.
Remember
Highlander 2 and how it disregarded the rules it made in the first
movie making everything nonsensical. Well it’s not that bad, but
the possessed in Rec 3 seem to have developed a Romero style zombie
walk whereas in the previous movies they could run like Usain Bolt.
Also, the shock and terror of Rec 2 was when the possessed spoke in
demonic tongues, yet it in Rec 3 they’ve gotten rid of that and
resorted back to screams and moans. I have no problem with running
or walking zombies or zombies that can call you names but surely
whichever one you’re going to do, stick with it.
The
main theme of the film is main characters and newlyweds Koldo and
Clara finding each other within a chaos mansion filled with the
possessed. Both actors are great and their love story, although
sickly sweet was nice and had some tender moments, all encapsulated
in a zombie filled backdrop.
Okay,
the story is momentary and has little to do with the old movies other
than the basic theme of the possessed attacking the living. Also
and perhaps the worst thing about Rec 3 is the newly added comedic
moments.
Comedy
and Horror can work. Return of the Living Dead was an amazing movie
and House had some hilarious moments. Rec 3 follows in their
footsteps with crazy costumes, stupid one liners and over the top
slap stick gore.
When
I first saw the Evil Dead, it was the ultimate experience in
gruelling terror. It was a black rainbow of a horror movie. It
didn’t play for laughs although some could be found throughout the
absurdity. Evil Dead 2 kept the threat and panic but added more
three stooges style comedy. Then came Evil Dead 3 Army of Darkness
where the ultimate experience in gruelling terror had been lost
completely in favour of slap stick, adventure and Bruce Campbell
becoming the superhero he is today. Yet it worked in The Evil Dead.
The progression was slow and you could see even from the first
instalment that Sam Raimi had a love for slap stick.
Rec
3 doesn’t take it as far as Army of Darkness, but it detracts so
much from its original movies it feels unrelated.
The
first two Rec movies were deadly serious without any hint of comedy.
The terror within felt real and you felt awkward and scared for the
characters. With Rec 3 nothing feels serious, the threat always
lingers with a laugh waiting to happen and nothing is ever scary.
The zombies don’t seem possessed and as demented and by the time
chainsaws and suspenders are shown everything feels like a video
game.
This
film has been labelled as a prequel, but really it’s not. I was
hoping that in a prequel it would explore the incredible story of the
penthouse and the Medeiros girl, but instead the filmmakers have
decided to push all that aside in favor of a run of the mill zombie
movie that, although well filmed, is a story that merely runs
alongside the originals with the briefest of nods.
Rec
2 took the first movie one step further with an intense storyline and
sheer panic driven characters. Regardless of how disturbing scenes
got the storyline was fascinating and kept you interested. By taking
that away, replacing it with mild peril, comic gore scenes, and
little story the film soon becomes just another zombie movie.
Having
said all that, if you’ve never seen Rec, and love a good zombie
yarn, you will enjoy this. It’s nicely paced and the comedy is
funny. It’s certainly a good Halloween party movie. It’s well
filmed, well acted and has some crazy ideas but it’s just not the
film I hoped it would be.
Pretty much how I felt. It's a good, acceptable zombie flick but not a [REC] movie.
ReplyDelete