WORLD WAR Z (2013) Dir: Marc Forster - Cine-Apocalypse

Breaking

Post Top Ad

Responsive Ads Here

Post Top Ad

Responsive Ads Here

Tuesday, 2 July 2013

WORLD WAR Z (2013) Dir: Marc Forster



Zombie time now with this years epic scope, globe trotting zombie flick, WORLD WAR Z. "Based" on Max Brook's best selling novel of the same name, Brad Pitt travels the world in search of the source of the zombie outbreak. It's epic in size but does it live up to the hype?...check out my review after the jump...
!!!!!!!!WARNING CONTAINS MILD SPOILERS!!!!!!!



I love zombie movies. I love the running zombies of Dawn Of Dead remake and 28 Days Later and I love
the Romero shuffler's of Night Of The Living Dead and it's various sequels. Romero's original 1978 Dawn Of The Dead is one of my all time top 5 films. When Max Brooks (son of legendary comedy writer/director Mel Brooks) released his Zombie Survival Guide, you know damn well that everyone who read it came up with their own survival plan for the zombie apocalypse, I know I did. But it was Brook's phenomenal novel World War Z that really made people take notice of this man's horror genius. The book followed a U.N researcher, in the years after the infamous zombie war, gathering stories from a round the globe from the people who survived the zombie apocalypse. It was an incredibly well written a detailed account of a fiction war and covered everything from the initial outbreak and patient zero to huge city battles, all in the form of an interview. We get the perspective of this war from soldiers, scientists and general survivors. An allstar cast including Alan Alda (M*A*S*H) and Mark Hamill (Star Wars) leant the voices to a wonderful and exiting audio book so it was inevitable that someone in Hollywood would try and get the rights to the book with the aim of turning it into a feature film.The rights went to Brad Pitt's Plan B production company after a tense bidding war with Leo DiCaprio's Appian Way company.

From an initial screenplay from celebrated sci-fi writer, J.Michael Straczynski, the film began to take shape, that was until the producer's disliked the direction the script was headed and brought on Matthew Michael Carnahan (State Of Play) to help polish the script. Then almost done with principle photography, the suits disliked the ending and brought on writer's Damon Lindlof and Drew Goddard (Prometheus/Cabin In The Woods) to re-write the ending. Not only did it have scripting problems but also shooting problems, it was over budget due to it's scale and shooting locations and reshoots set it back. Director Marc Forster, who previously fucked up Bond, seems to find it hard to shoot action, which is understandable when you see his previous work, Monster's Ball, Finding Neverland and The Kite Runner with only Machine Gun Preacher being a bit more action packed. The guy does struggle with the epic scale and some of the editing is so choppy you can't see what the hell is going on. But to be fair to the guy, he did eventually pull off the most expensive zombie film ever made.

The plot follows Jerry Lane, a former U.N investigator who, with his wife and two kids are caught up an intense zombie outbreak in Pennsylvania. Managing to escape, Jerry finds himself drafted to help investigate the source of the outbreak which takes him from the U.S to South Korea to Israel and eventually Wales, Trying to discover the source and a cure for the zombie virus.

A lot of things worked for the film but a lot of things didn't work, such as the opening attack which happens far too fast and out of nowhere, there's very little build up except for a news story playing on the TV in their kitchen. Then you have the escape plan, anyone who has ever seen a zombie film will know that a crowded apartment building is not the place to hide, if there's a zombie outbreak then the chances are the majority of tenants will be infected and you have just locked your self in with them, not a good idea. Secondly, characters are introduced then killed off straight away before we even get to see what they can do. Top hardcore elite Navy Seals cannot survive but an unarmed U.N investigator can?...hmmmm.... The overuse of of CGI is quite annoying, it's handy for the wide shots of destruction but when you have a rolling ball of zombies coming towards you, it gets a bit ridiculous. They also made the zombies super fast, super strong and able to jump, which to me, puts them more in line with the infected from 28 Days Later than actual zombies, and speaking of 28 days later, World War Z pretty much rips off the incubation period for the virus, once bitten you turn with in ten seconds. There is no mention of the bitten actually dying then coming back to life. The last big problem with the film is the ending. Now being a Welshman, it was nice to hear Cardiff Airport mentioned and that the final 3rd was set in Wales, but what we had with this completely re-written ending is what I consider a “Generic Zombie Movie Setting”, meaning that there are lot of zombie films that take place or at some point in the film are set in a medical facility which has become infected with the dead. World War Z does this, instead of going for a huge ass kickingly awesome battle scene like the battle of Yonkers from the book, the went for low-key mediacal facility corridors. It didn't sit well with the scale of the previous hour and it kind of drags the film down. One last thing before we go onto the good shit, for a film, released with a 15 certificate in the U.K, World War Z, is completely devoid of any gore, blood, general zombie death, Which for zombie fan's is probably the biggest sin a film maker can make when it comes to the overall brutality and visceral action of a zombie film. We all know R rated zombie films make money, just look at the previously mentioned 28 Days Later/Weeks Later, Zack Snyder's remake of Dawn Of The Dead and Simon Pegg/Edgar Wright's Shaun Of The Dead, hell even zombie romance Warm Bodies had gore, and that was a 12A.

Now for the good stuff. As I said previously, Marc Forster does struggle to shoot action, but with WWZ he's managed to get much better, it's still all choppy editing and sound FX but it's handled better than he's handled it previously. The epic scenes of zombie chaos are quite exciting especially the attack on Jerusalem, when the chopper flies over the grounds outside of their giant wall it's quite a cool shot, even if you can't take the wall of zombies seriously the Jerusalem attack is still pretty good part of the film. Brad Pitt is pretty good as Jerry, it's not his best performance but it still manages to carry the film and Peter Capaldi pops up towards the end as a World Health Organization doctor along with Moritz Bliebtreu from Run Lola Run. But despite all the flaws the film has and for a film with a budget of $200+ million and run time of 117 minutes, it's still an exciting action adventure film that totally engrossed me. I'm surprised the film ran under 2hrs as I fully expected this to run to at least 140+ minutes considering the problems it had during it's production.

Overall, World War Z is an entertaining popcorn action flick that happens to have a lot of zombies in it. Was Marc Forster the best choice as director for this film? No, but the man through his hat in the ring, rolled up his sleeves and gave it a shot and for what he managed to do, I commend him, had a more experiences action/horror director handled this with a tighter script, World War Z could have been the zombie movie to end all zombie movies but as it stands, WWZ is just another zombie film. Entertaining but ultimately flawed. It gets 3 stars out of this guy!..


No comments:

Post a Comment

Post Top Ad

Responsive Ads Here