THE KILLER (1989) Dir: John Woo BADASS ALPHABET - Cine-Apocalypse

Breaking

Post Top Ad

Responsive Ads Here

Post Top Ad

Responsive Ads Here

Saturday, 6 April 2013

THE KILLER (1989) Dir: John Woo BADASS ALPHABET















As you readers may be aware, here at Cine-Apocalypse.com, we are creating an A-Z of bad ass films which will take place over the course of the year, we already have The Yakuza for the letter Y and this time i bring a film for the letter K. My good friend Tim Porter has taken time out from making his first feature film to write a very in-depth look at John Woo's action masterpiece from 1989, The Killer. check out Tim's review after the jump..



Written By Tim Porter

Oh boy do I have a task on my hands! Peter Osmond, a good friend and colleague of mine has set the mammoth task of attempting to put into words why I love this film so much. I can never truly do the film the justice it really deserves but here we go anyways:

Ten years on from first seeing it, the mark it left on me is nothing short of significant. The mere sight of revisiting the production idents take me back to the first time I experienced it, make no mistake it is an experience. The sensation of being physically overwhelmed by it’s sheer excitement, while at the same time moving me to tears in it’s final movement is unprecedented. No film has since engaged me quite like John Woo’s The Killer, which in my opinion is nothing short of a masterpiece. I would even go so far as to call it my favorite film of all time, bar none!

Without ‘The Killer’ there would for example be no lone mariachis, going from bar to bar with guns inside of his guitar case. Other directors like Besson, Tarantino, Jarmusch, Refn, even Johnnie To have been influenced by this production in some capacity. Think of the interplay between Natalie Portman and Jean Reno in ‘Leon’, which demonstrates another lone figure whom makes a mistake. Leon realises that beneath the code of honor and the daily routines he religiously lives, he has a heart and you cannot by any circumstances have one in this line of work. This narrative is borrowed directly from Woo’s film which was made five years before Leon’s release.

The Killer’ plays out with neo noir aesthetics. It’s dark, brooding and bleak but retains some charming moments between the characters which can be: romantic, funny and help balance out the material making it not become one note. One of the more fascinating aspects of the piece is problematizing the relationship between ‘hero’ and ‘villains’. In many ways we have parallel protagonists. Who do we route for? Does it even matter? The audience identification becomes unclear, making the films narrative more engaging and also showcasing that: these individuals while being on different sides of the law are in fact almost alike, they could even be brothers. These character arcs are what raise the film for me from being a straight forward action romp into a great film with real substance.

The Killer’ also is the definitive definition of Heroic Bloodshed. For those that are not familiar with the term, Heroic Bloodshed is generally a film, which is made in Hong Kong, showcasing sequences of prolonged action, which are usually graphic and operatic in their staging. They are often compared to martial art films because of their focus on extended action, which is integral in advancing the plot. Rather than swordplay or extended beautifully choreographed fight scenes, melodramatic techniques are adopted and played out with brutal gunplay.

Themes within these films focus on protagonist’s who are more often then enough criminals. These individuals choose to live their lives by codes of honor. Themes explored in films of this style showcase a central anxiety of the disappearance of older values/traditions being lost amidst the modernization of the city or the new generation of upcoming criminals, who have no respect of values . An incident will always be the catalyst for changes to the lives forever of the leads and will have consequences long term for all involved. All of these elements are present here.

It has a strong concurrent of emotion, even in it’s action scenes making the experience more gut wrenching as you truly invest in the characters. These films usually end in a downbeat, tragic way. Our lead protagonists are complex, not one dimensional. Each character reveal a side of themselves, which initially you would not associate with their image which can be perceived as ‘macho’. More times then often their lives could have changed for the better. Yet just like classic noir, their actions come back to haunt them and are brought to a logical conclusion, one that the audience may not desire but is more appreciated for the filmmaker’s not copping out.

Just like with my analysis on the Tartan Asia Extreme brand, there is an important combination of both East and West aesthetics and visual techniques used to bring this project to fruition. Even in the re-dubbing of this film, Ah Jong and Inspector Li’s nicknames are changed to Disney characters, which is further prove of this. Just like with the work of Kitano, the non judgmental, clear absence of who is ‘good’ or ‘bad’, whilst also combining a marriage of hitman/gangster films is truly significant to what came after it. Replacing what would usually be seen in Wuxia films, specifically that in the vein of the emotional climax of the Jackie Chan production ‘Police Story’, the raw emotion and brutal sheer aggression of that film is replaced with guns, blood and flying doves, which in turn has spiritual connotations which can be compared to the main characters, attempting desperately to run away. Sadly they are confined in one big bird cage.

The violence is beautifully stage, making you cheer and gasp with equal measure. Woo in this film makes death look glorious. The final scene in the church, which must last all of twenty minutes is a truly enlightening, euphoric, brutal and worthwhile experience on the viewer. The use of multiple camera set ups, slowing down of action borrows heavily from the films of Sam Peckinpah. Interestingly however Woo is not simply referencing his peers. Every device used to present the action to the audience is justified and does not seem like a series of cool actions scenes which are made to simply get bums on seats. The time and progression of building tension, atmosphere and character development make what must be around eight scenes of pulp action feel like they go on for an eternity.

It saddens me that just like with the Asia Extreme brand, Hollywood are churning out remakes of definitive movies from the past, which have a huge significance of radically changing genres and audiences tastes in the process. ‘The Killer’ will be a 3D remake but undoubtably lose all of its charm, overall effect and become another generic cardboard cutout of a greater film, which was not originally in the english language. This also might explain why we really need to see the same film twice?

Backtracking to my point that in my eyes this is the best film of all time, obviously many will disagree with me. Some may argue that this film is overly sentimental, manipulative and over the top, so what? Throughout the history of cinema, especially that which are considered to be the best of all time: ‘The Godfather’, ‘Citizen Kane’, ‘Vertigo’ etc all use manipulative tools to engage it’s audience in order to tell a story. Others will comment saying that the story is unoriginal, even cliche. To some extent I can agree with this point but what sets this apart from it‘s predecessors is it’s masterful direction. ‘Hard Boiled’ for instance I would argue pales in comparison to this film because of the lack of emotional investment to the characters. Inspector Tequila for example: while being an undeniable on screen bad arse, as a character I know that he is untouchable, no one will stop him and nothing bad will ever happen to him. He might as well simply be a superhero.

When we compare Ah Jong to Tequila, on the surface he can be seen as the perfect hitman, a loner who lives in separation from society and religiously lives his life by a code of honor. He is untouched in his profession until the moment he walks into the jazz club and everything changes forever. We establish that he is ruthless when it comes to his work, significantly that he has heart and tries not to hurt innocent people in the process. His actions on this occasion have consequences. While trying to protect Jenny, played by Sally Yeh, her eyesight catches the muzzle flash from his gun accidentally. It’s with this moment that we begin to realise that Ah Jong not only feels regret from his actions but that in his own life there has been an incompleteness. He is not perfect, he has problems and this is what makes more of an interesting protagonist to invest in.

Ah Jong agrees to do one more job in order to repair the damage he caused to Sally’s eyes. Betrayal ensues and a complex love, male bonding triangle/relationship occurs when Inspector Li, a young determined police officer makes it his all to find Ah Jong. Over the course of the film the situations and events become more intense with each passing minute. Without giving the game away, Jenny caught in the middle between these two men from each end of the law, oblivious to the fact that one of the men, who she falls in love with is the person who injured her at the club and is the reason she is going virtually blind. A fight against tradition, values, love and respect ensues and climax’s with a darkly funny but heartbreaking conclusion which should leave you speechless.

I will agree that Sally Yeh’s character is a tad bit one note, but that is justified considering that she is vulnerable, scared and more importantly alone. She is losing her sight bit by bit as the film progresses and is the definition of innocence. She is the light which can free Jong from his torment and regret. Ah Jong played wonderfully by Chow Yun Fat in what is undoubtably the best performance of his career, makes you truly believe that his on the path of redemption and wants out of the game for good. Woo’s employment of romanticism, stylizing the violence, engaging us with a character who radically changes his morals and way of life because of the consequences of his actions. He is neither good nor bad. While it’s an accident, he still kills for a living and it’s his fault for getting an innocent bystander caught in the crossfire.

There is no denying it is a product of it’s time. Filmed in ninety two days, at a cost of fourteen million Hong Kong dollars (the equivalent of two million US dollars), ‘The Killer’ was considered the most expensive production of it’s time. Sporting a body count of one hundred and twenty, it’s easy for people to disregard this film as nothing more than exploitation. Others will argue that ‘the characters often look like icons instead of real people, and women are only used for emotional manipulation’ (lovehkfilm.com). I have to strongly disagree, not just because I am a fan of the film but more so that how the writer from that site can call this a guilty pleasure is completely mistaken. This is not Tommy Wiseau’s ‘The Room’, John Waters ‘Pink Flamingos’ etc, for the majority of the film it’s harrowing, touching but more so it’s tragic. I guess it all comes down to: whether you buy into the conflicts and acting on display whether you truly go with it.

I am aware that I maybe not the right person to clique this film, purely because of the emotional connection I have with it. It has influenced me as a filmmaker and to this day, every time I watch it I still feel exactly the same. Even if you are not a fan of action cinema in general, you may well enjoy this film purely because it has a heart behind the trigger. 



No comments:

Post a Comment

Post Top Ad

Responsive Ads Here